Disadvantages of ordinary anti-theft alarms

After the anti-theft doors and anti-theft cages, the traditional ordinary anti-theft alarms have shown many shortcomings, and it is difficult to meet the needs of the current more complicated security situation. According to experts, the detection equipment of ordinary anti-theft alarms mainly uses physical induction alarms, that is, physical detectors, such as infrared sensors, temperature sensors, magnetic sensors, glass break sensors, etc., are installed at each user end. When unattended, the detector is used to trigger the alarm, and a signal is transmitted through the telephone line to notify the alarm center. This type of detection equipment mainly detects changes in environmental physical quantities and states. This detection method does not inherently have the ability to identify the target, so the accompanying false alarm problem has been plaguing the security system. After using multi-detection elements, multi-technology composite testing and intelligent data analysis did greatly improve the performance and function of the detector, and also reduced the probability of false alarms, but did not fundamentally solve the problem. Each type of detector has technical limitations, especially infrared detectors, which are susceptible to environmental influences, susceptible to shielding and false alarms and false alarms. Such false alarms due to the low intelligence of detection equipment account for a relatively large proportion, accounting for approximately 80% of the false alarms.

Such frequent false alarms not only make the public security organs and relevant departments waste police power and various resources, but also tend to form a paralytic psychology. And as long as the principles and inherent defects of the above-mentioned equipment are understood, the thieves can easily deceive the detection of the equipment to achieve the purpose of theft. This inherent defect is more harmful to underreporting.

In addition, another drawback of ordinary anti-theft alarms is that the number of defense zones is small or they are not divided at all. For the case where the user is equipped with multiple detectors or emergency buttons, the management center cannot distinguish the nature of the alarm and cannot make a correct response in a timely manner. Even when not armed, the alarm signal cannot be sent out at all.

The inherent defects of the existing traditional security technology and the backwardness of the design concept make the traditional alarm mode present many disadvantages, such as many false alarms, single alarms, no on-site images and sounds, and inability to effectively supervise staff. Such a security system simply cannot meet the ever-changing and increasing security needs. Relying on the safety of the family and the safety of family property depends on the moral self-discipline of human beings. Today, with the rapid development of modern technology, crime is becoming more intelligent and the means are more concealed. It is more important to strengthen modern security technology. With a safe, stable, reliable, no false alarms, no blind spots, timely response, zero-distance police, and technology-based security alarm system, customers have been looking forward to it.

In the face of numerous security manufacturers and uneven security products, consumers not only have to ask, "Which security product should be purchased in order to guarantee home safety?" "Intelligent security" may be the best answer. Below, we will make a detailed comparison of the differences between the new intelligent security products and other anti-theft alarms.